ILN Journal: Indian Literary Narratives

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ILN Journal: Indian Literary Narratives

Beyond Engagement: Scrutinizing Second Language Acquisition (SLA) in Active Digital Classrooms

Submitted
16 February 2026
Published
2026-03-30

Abstract

Learners face numerous hurdles while acquiring a second language. The use of mobile applications and digital technologies in language learning enhances the language proficiency of the learners. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of technology in second language classroom. The study also tries to explore the theoretical aspects of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning by Richard Mayer. The role of facilitator has also been elucidated along with Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) model. The method of the study includes a quantitative method to collect data for the pretest and post-test. “Mobile learning offers unprecedented opportunities for learners to engage with language learning materials anytime and anywhere. This flexibility promotes learner autonomy, enhances motivation, and supports individualized learning experiences, allowing students to progress at their own pace and according to their specific learning needs” (Kukulska-Hulme and Shield 273).The methodological tools used in the research include structured classroom activities, digital tools and instructional materials. The findings of the research elucidate that the technology and mobile applications help learners to attain language proficiency. The research tries to explain that technology enhanced language learning plays a pivotal role in second language acquisition. The future scope of the study can be associated with emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Virtual Learning environment.

 

References

  1. Alipkhanova, Gulnara, et al. “Digital Tools in Modern Education: Practice-Oriented Learning and Independent Cognitive Activity.” International Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, 2021, pp. 1-8.
  2. Alivi, J. “The Role of Technology in TPACK Framework for Interactive Learning.” Journal of Educational Technology Development, vol. 8, no. 2, 2020, pp. 1-7.
  3. Ameri, Mehran. “Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL): A Solution for Language Learning Barriers.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 98, 2019, pp. 1364-1368.
  4. Annet, Maria. “Innovative Strategies in Language Education Through Technology.” Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, vol. 14, no. 2, 2022, pp. 25-32.
  5. Ary, Donald, et al. Introduction to Research in Education. 10th ed., Cengage Learning, 2019.
  6. Aashika, R., and M. Batta. “Digital Tools in English Language Teaching.” Journal of Language Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2021, pp. 65-70.
  7. Babu, K. R. “Technology in English Language Teaching.” International Journal of English Language Teaching, vol. 5, no. 3, 2018, pp. 165-170.
  8. Burston, Jack. “Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: A Review of the Literature.” Language Learning & Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, 2015, pp. 4-20.
  9. Candlin, Christopher, and David Nunan. Language Teaching Methodology. Prentice Hall, 1988.
  10. Chapelle, Carol A. Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge UP, 2001.
  11. Chen, X. “Personalized Learning Through Mobile-Assisted Language Learning.” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, 2020, pp. 215-220.
  12. Chumpavan, S., et al. “Teacher Readiness in Technology-Enhanced Classrooms.” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 1, 2021, pp. 1-5.
  13. Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed., Sage Publications, 2018.
  14. Hubbard, Philip, and Mike Levy. Teacher Education in CALL. John Benjamins Publishing, 2006.
  15. Kacetl, Jaroslav, and Blanka Klimova. “Use of Mobile Applications in Language Learning.” Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, 2019, pp. 1-12.
  16. Karthika, R., et al. “Mobile Applications in Language Learning.” Journal of Language Education and Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, 2020, pp. 105-115.
  17. Kukulska-Hulme, Agnes, and Lesley Shield. “Mobile Learning for Language Learning.” ReCALL, vol. 20, no. 3, 2008, pp. 271-289.
  18. Long, Michael, and Graham Crookes. “Task-Based Language Teaching.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 12, 1992, pp. 27-56.
  19. Mayer, Richard E. Multimedia Learning. 2nd ed., Cambridge UP, 2009.
  20. McLelland, Nicola. “Visual Learning in Language Education.” Language Learning Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, 2019, pp. 1-10.
  21. Nita, B. “Modern Technology in English Language Teaching.” Journal of English Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, 2017, pp. 168-172.
  22. Ortikov, Azizbek. “Language Learning Strategies in Technology-Enhanced Environments.” International Journal of Linguistics, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020, pp. 160-168.
  23. Puentedura, Ruben R. “SAMR Model: A Framework for Technology Integration.” 2014.
  24. Rathina Prabhu, V., et al. “Multimedia Learning in Education.” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, 2019, pp. 215-222.
  25. Sorden, Stephen. “The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning.” Educational Technology Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-10.
  26. Suryani, A., et al. “SAMR Model in Technology Integration.” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-6.
  27. Tuychieva, N., et al. “Virtual Learning Environments in Language Learning.” International Journal of Education and Technology, vol. 14, no. 2, 2021, pp. 45-52.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.