Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 3 No. S2 (2026): ILN Journal: Indian Literary Narratives

Purusha and Prakriti: A Samkhya Philosophical Perspective on David Grossman’s A Horse Walks into a Bar

Submitted
18 July 2026
Published
2026-10-09

Abstract

This article interprets David Grossman’s A Horse Walks into a Bar (2016) through the Samkhya concepts of Purusha and Prakriti. Samkhya, an ancient Indian philosophical system, defines Purusha as pure, passive consciousness and Prakriti as the material principle made up of the three gunas: Sattva, Rajas, and Tamas. The study examines how these concepts illuminate Dovaleh Greenstein's character, since the character's consciousness, body, emotions, actions, and relationship with the audience show the interaction between Purusha and Prakriti. The analysis studies Dovaleh’s experiences through the distinction between Purusha as witnessing consciousness and Prakriti as the domain of mental, bodily, and emotional activity, including the audience’s responses. His wisdom reflects Sattva, his energetic, restless stage performance shows Rajas, and his experiences of trauma and suffering reveal the consequences of identifying with the material world. The study argues that Dovaleh’s suffering intensifies through identification with his body, emotions, and remembered experiences, particularly following the death of a family member. Thus, Samkhya provides a philosophical structure for understanding Dovaleh’s fractured identity, psychological suffering, and struggle between consciousness and experience. Using comparative close reading, the study also examines Avishai Lazar’s mediation of Dovaleh’s performance. Purusha is treated as a philosophical point of comparison, not as Dovaleh’s personality or an agent controlling his body. The reading distinguishes psychic resilience from liberation and does not claim that Grossman intentionally adopts Samkhya.

References

  1. Antic, Ivan. SÂMKHYA: An Ancient Science of Nature and the Human Soul. SAMKHYA PUBLISHING LTD, London, 2022.
  2. Bhagel, Richa. “Purusha and Prakruti of the Samkhyakarika Philosophy: Rationalising Decisions of an Individual in Synchronization with the Environment.” International Journal of Hinduism & Philosophy, A Journal of the Bhagavad Gita Research Foundation (BGRF), November 2019.
  3. Biswas, Arpita. “The Notion of Purusha (Self) in Samkhya Philosophy: A Psychological Investigation.” International Journal of Progressive Research in Engineering Management and Science, vol. 4, no. 8, August 2024, pp. 1086–1093.
  4. Burley, Mikel. Classical Samkhya and Yoga: An Indian Metaphysics of Experience. Routledge, 2007. https://www.routledge.com/p/book/9780415394482.
  5. Chatterjee, Satischandra, and Dhirendramohan Datta. “An Introduction to Indian Philosophy.” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 37, no. 19, September 1940, p. 529. https://doi.org/10.2307/2017945.
  6. Dalvoy Expert Team. “Purusha and Prakriti: Relationship Evaluation | UPSC Mains PHILOSOPHY-PAPER-I 2013.” Dalvoy – UPSC Preparation, 4 January 2026, https://www.dalvoy.com/en/upsc/mains/previous-years/2013/philosophy-paper-i/purusha-prakriti-relation. Accessed 31 July 2026.
  7. “Dharma: The Social Order.” The Pluralism Project, https://pluralism.org/dharma-the-social-order. Accessed 5 October 2026.
  8. Gandhi, V. R. The Systems of Indian Philosophy. Edited by K. K. Dixit, Shri Mahavira Jaina Vidyalaya, Bombay.
  9. Greenblatt, Stephen. “The King of the Bitter Laugh.” The New York Review of Books, 20 April 2017, https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/04/20/david-grossman-king-of-bitter-laugh/.
  10. Grossman, David. A Horse Walks into a Bar. Translated by Jessica Cohen, Jonathan Cape, London, November 2016.
  11. Gupta, Aditya Kumar, and Sooraj Kumar Maurya. “Revivalism in Indian Educational Philosophy: Reinterpreting Ancient Wisdom for Modern Times.” Cogent Education, vol. 13, no. 1, 2026, article 2584914. Taylor & Francis Online, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2584914.
  12. Ishvarakrishna. Samkhyakarika with the Commentary of Gaudapada. Translated by T. G. Mainkar. Digital text hosted by Rutgers University, https://sites.rutgers.edu/edwin-bryant/wp-content/uploads/sites/169/2020/11/Samkhya-Karika-Gaudapada1.pdf. Cited by karika number.
  13. Larson, Gerald James, and Ram Shankar Bhattacharya. The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 4: Samkhya, A Dualist Tradition in Indian Philosophy. Princeton UP, 2014.
  14. Mandal, Raspoti. “Prakṛti and Puruṣa in Sāṁkhya Philosophy: A Survey.” International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, vol. 14, 2 February 2026.
  15. Miller, Christopher. “What Is ‘Indian Philosophy?’ – Dharma Traditions, Dharma Studies, and the Quest to Interpret South Asian Religions for Global Audiences.” Arihanta Institute, 1 August 2025, https://www.arihantainstitute.org/blog/101-what-is-indian-philosophy-dharma-traditions-dharma-studies-and-the-quest-to-interpret-south-asian-religions-for-global-audiences. Accessed 26 July 2026.
  16. Pal, Swarupa. “Mind: Through the Lens of Some Schools of Indian Philosophy and Ayurveda.” Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, vol. 9, no. 12, 2021, pp. 50–54. Quest Journals, http://www.questjournals.org.
  17. Perrett, Roy W. “Computationality, Mind and Value: The Case of Sāmkhya-Yoga.” Asian Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, 2001, pp. 5–14. Taylor & Francis, https://doi.org/10.1080/09552360120048807.
  18. Sharma, Suhani, et al. “Sattva Guna as a Predictor of Wisdom and PWB.” The International Journal of Indian Psychology, vol. 4, issue 1, no. 75, October–December 2016, DIP: 18.01.054/20160401. http://www.ijip.in.
  19. Yin Yoga. “Purusha and Prakriti – Yin Yoga.” Yin Yoga, 8 May 2024, https://yinyoga.com/yinsights/purusha-prakriti.
  20. Zhang Chenxiao. “A Study on the Trauma Theme in A Horse Walks into a Bar.” International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, vol. 3, no. 3, 2021, pp. 12–16. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.030303.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.